Top of Sidebar
Mission Statement
Do It Yourself Tips and Tricks
Books, Equipment, Software, and Training Reviews
Film Critiques
Community Section
Savings and Links
Editorials
Archives
Bottom of Sidebar
Back to the Home Page
   Final Short Critique: 
   Smashing Stereotypes

   Director:
Kitania Kavey
 
   Distribution: No Exclusive Distribution
   Budget: $5,000
   Genre: Drama

   Running Time: 23 minutes

   Release Dates: July 1, 2005
   Website: SmashingStereotypes.com
   Trailer: Click Here

   Review Date:
January 15, 2006
   Reviewed By: Kari Ann Morgan

Josiah Lee is a struggling actor in Los Angeles. He makes the rounds of auditions and meetings with his agent, trying to find a fulfilling (and well-paying) acting gig. However, besides trying to pay his bills, Josiah faces a deeper, more nagging problem: he is constantly being cast in stereotypical Asian (specifically Chinese) roles.

No one seems to understand Josiah,
from his acting class...
...to casting directors that
only see his ethnicity.

Content
I really liked what the film had to say about how we (knowingly or not) stereotype other people, especially those that are not Caucasian. In Josiah's case, everyone around him thinks that all Asians talk funny and are martial arts wizards. They don't seem to understand that not only does he want to do other roles than just the "Chinese food delivery boy" or "kung fu fighter," but he's also a good actor. Josiah's challenge is to make others understand that.

The writing for this film was tight and well-developed. Dialogue flowed well and was believable. Josiah's acting was very good as he portrayed the frustrated acceptance of someone who is forced to accept a social stereotype to earn a living. Acting for a lot of the secondary characters though, seemed a bit caricature-ish and over the top. The things that made Josiah's acting effective were the small facial expressions and his overall body language that conveyed his feelings; however, several of the other characters (e.g. the drama instructor, the other male actor at the beginning of the film, the desk girl at the open auditions) over-exaggerated their gestures and facial expressions, making them seem even larger on film. Subtler actions and expressions are better, especially because the camera picks up more than we think it does. As it is, it almost feels as though they decided to bring up stereotypes in the asian community by stereotyping everyone else, from seedy agents to silicon-enhanced Hollywood secretaries to over-the-top, foppish directors.

The major issue I had, however, was that the ending was too weak and unresolved. Josiah's purpose throughout the film was to make someone understand that he was really a good actor, not just "some Asian actor." But when he finally gets a director to see that, the project is called off, and that's the end of it. You get the sense that the director is going to just forget about Josiah and he'll be right back where he was at the beginning of the film. Instead, it would've been helpful to show the audience that Josiah did achieve something, however small, for his efforts. For example, maybe the producer could say something like, "Well, this project fell through, but a buddy of mine is having auditions for a military movie and they need a radio operator. It's not much, but there are a few speaking parts. I can give you his name if you want to try out over there." That would show that Josiah had made an impression, and even though nothing was definite, at least there was a chance that he might start getting "real" acting roles.

Also, especially with such a professional-looking DVD, it is important to have some kind of DVD menu. Even if you don't have that much to put on it, a trailer and basic scene selection are essential. It helps make you, your production company, and your project look even more professional.

Both the stereotypically seedy,
notoriously greedy agent...
...and the loud directorial archetypes
appear in this short on stereotypes.

Visual Look
While the overall look of this film was well done, there weren't many things to make it "pop" visually. (There's nothing wrong with that; directors like Kevin Smith have a very basic visual style that works for them.) Shots were framed well and in focus. There were no white-balancing issues and both indoor and outdoor scenes were evenly lit. The editing was good as well, although the use of "wipe" transitions really only works well once.

Mission | Tips & Tricks | Equipment & Software Reviews | Film Critiques
Groups & Community | Links & Savings
| Home


Contact Us Search Submit Films for Critique